Quasi Dictum

A place for educational perspectives and opinions. Legalese: The statments at this site are of the writers only. Quasi Dictum has no control over the information you access via links, does not endorse that information and cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided.

Name:
Location: Vancouver, WA, United States

Teacher

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Science teachers vs Al Gore


From the L.A. Times -


In a Washington Post op-ed piece, she (David) noted that whenever she screened the film, admiring viewers clamored that "every student in every school in the United States needed to see this movie." So how could a teachers' group turn down her generous offer while scooping up millions of dollars of oil company dough — including $6 million from Exxon Mobil since 1996?

"These companies have spent years misinforming the public about global warming … lying to the public about global warming!" David railed in a phone conversation that singed my right ear. If Big Oil really had students' best interests in mind, they could build playgrounds, she said, rather than trying to spin curriculum. "They're trying to infiltrate the schools."

Bill Aldridge, who served 16 years as executive director of the science teachers association, has followed the controversy and is appalled at his former organization's decision. "They don't want to offend oil companies and American Petroleum Institute," he said.



From the Oregonian:

The problem is, David is not telling the whole story. In a news release two days after David's article originally ran in The Washington Post, the teachers association provided the other side of the story; namely, it had offered an alternative means of distribution to David. That method was for the film company to purchase the association's mailing list and distribute the 50,000 copies on its own. However, that apparently wasn't good enough for David. The teachers association also explained that even though companies such as ExxonMobil and Shell donate millions of dollars to it, they give with the full knowledge that "the NSTA is solely responsible for developing, directing and implementing the programs we offer to teachers."

Then, two days later, on Nov. 30, Science magazine published an article about the tiff and shed even more light on the subject. First, the teachers association had not completely ignored the movie. In fact, it had done a few things to promote it:

Last month, the association's newsletter for middle-school teachers ran a five-page article on the topic of global warming and mentioned Gore's movie in the first paragraph.

The association also has offered to post a link to the movie on its Web site and to announce the availability of the DVD in a weekly e-mail letter and a monthly publication.

David subsequently admitted that, yes, the teachers group had offered the mailing list as an alternative means of distribution (although she conveniently neglected to mention it in her column). But, as she states, "You don't want to send out a cold letter, and it costs a lot of money." So, in effect, she is upset about two things:

First, the teachers association wouldn't provide a letter endorsing the movie, even though it would be in direct violation of its longstanding policy prohibiting endorsements of any product or message by an outside organization.

Second, the teachers association wouldn't pay for the costs of mailing 50,000 DVDs.

But, then, why should it? It wasn't the association's idea.

After looking at all this, it appears that the inconvenient truth is this case is that Laurie David should stop whining and start telling the whole story.

Monday, December 11, 2006

Ok, Ok, I know posts are way down and loyal (all three of you) readers are complaining.

The Seattle Times continues with their Killer, horrible PR for ed stories with todays article on an "alternative" HS in Seattle.

Here is the opening:

Between schoolwork and raising her daughter, 16-year-old Kathy Graves wrote letters. First to her principal; then to the man in charge of high schools; finally to the superintendent of schools himself.

More than a dozen letters, asking for help at John Marshall Alternative School. In one eight-week period, Graves wrote, she had a different substitute teacher every day — except for six days she had no teacher at all.


Wait it gets better:

- Only 24 percent of students graduated on time in 2004-05. By contrast, South Lake High School, which serves at-risk students across town, graduated 66 percent of its students on time. Last year was particularly dismal: Only one John Marshall student received a diploma on schedule.

- On any given day, John Marshall teachers are doing work normally reserved for the principal. Others lead classes they're not qualified to teach. Over three school years, one teacher was absent more than half the time.


That second paragraph happens in any school. Don't we all know the teacher who misses work to get an oil change or "emergency" dental work (3x a year no less)


Also, like my last post, the principal takes it fast, hard, and below the belt:

But in interviews with a dozen current and former staff members, most of whom would not go on the record for fear of retribution, a consensus emerged: The principal is not doing his job. He's anointed teachers to do it instead.

One teacher regularly communicated with district officials on staffing matters, writing e-mails "on behalf of Dr. Drake." That same teacher, along with a colleague, set up a booth at the district's kindergarten fair last winter, trying to recruit children as young as 5 to John Marshall, which serves grades six to 12.

The district had not even heard of the plan to add elementary-age students, let alone approved it.




The Times has links to PDF files of Kathy's letters and some other district memos.